Risk Factors for Liver-related and Non-liver-related Mortality Following a Sustained Virological Response After Direct-acting Antiviral Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in a Real-world Cohort

Ritsuzo Kozuka; Akihiro Tamori; Masaru Enomoto; Yoshimi Muto-Yukawa; Naoshi Odagiri; Kohei Kotani; Hiroyuki Motoyama; Etsushi Kawamura; Atsushi Hagihara; Hideki Fujii; Sawako Uchida-Kobayashi; Norifumi Kawada

Disclosures

J Viral Hepat. 2023;30(5):374-385. 

In This Article

Abstract and Introduction

Abstract

A direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-induced sustained virological response (SVR) reduces the risk of mortality. However, the risk factors associated with liver-related and non-liver-related mortality following a SVR after DAA treatment are unclear. We assessed the incidence and risk factors of liver-related and non-liver-related mortality in 1180 patients who achieved a SVR after DAA treatment. During the follow-up period after DAA treatment (median duration, 1099 [range: 84–2345] days), 53 (4.5%) patients died: 15 due to liver-related mortality, 25 due to non-liver-related mortality and 13 due to unknown causes. The all-cause, liver-related and non-liver-related mortality rates were 14.9, 4.2 and 7.0/1000 person-years, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after DAA treatment (p = .009; hazard ratio [HR], 31.484), an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline ≤61.68 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = .015; HR, 6.607), and an α-fetoprotein level post-treatment ≥7.6 ng/ml (p = .041; HR, 18.490) were significantly associated with liver-related mortality. Furthermore, eGFR ≤67.94 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline (p = .012; HR, 3.407) and albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) grade ≥ 2 at SVR (p = .024; HR, 3.449) were significantly associated with non-liver-related mortality. Early diagnosis and therapeutic interventions for HCC development after DAA treatment are important to reduce liver-related mortality. The ALBI grade, which reflects the hepatic functional reserve, is a useful predictor of non-liver-related mortality after a SVR induced by DAA treatment. Furthermore, the renal dysfunction caused by metabolic syndrome may affect prognosis even after eliminating hepatitis C virus.

Introduction

An estimated 58 million people were chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) worldwide in 2019,[1] and 10%–20% of HCV-infected individuals develop liver complications, including cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).[2] Thus, the ultimate goal of anti-HCV treatment is to prevent the development of cirrhosis and HCC and reduce mortality.

An all-oral direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen was approved in Japan in 2014. This regimen is used for a large number of patients with chronic HCV infection, and it results in a rapid elimination of the HCV RNA level and remission of liver inflammation in most patients without any adverse effects. This interferon (IFN)-free DAA treatment achieves a sustained virological response (SVR) in nearly 100% of patients with chronic HCV infection.[3–6]

PEG-IFN and ribavirin had been the standard treatments for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Although SVR rates are lower in patients who received an IFN-based treatment compared with IFN-free DAA treatment, several long-term follow-up studies of patients who received IFN-based treatment showed that the HCC incidence and all-cause, liver-related, and non-liver-related mortality rates were significantly lower in patients who achieved a SVR than in those who did not.[7–9]

Although the follow-up periods in studies of patients who received DAA treatment have been relatively short, several studies have reported that the HCC incidence[10–14] as well as all-cause, liver-related, and non-liver-related mortality rates[9,13–18] were significantly lower in patients who achieved a SVR than in those who did not or in untreated patients. Janjua, et al. evaluated the effect of a DAA-induced SVR on mortality risk in a large population-based cohort after more than 5 years of follow-up and found that achieving an SVR was associated with 81% and 78% reductions in all-cause and liver-related mortality rates, respectively, compared with no treatment. Achieving a SVR was associated with 81% and 87% reductions in all-cause and liver-related mortality rates, respectively, compared with not achieving a SVR.[18] Furthermore, there was no significant effect of achieving a SVR induced by IFN-based or DAA treatment on HCC risk or mortality.[19,20]

In addition, a DAA-induced SVR results in hepatic benefits, such as improved or reduced hepatic fibrosis,[21,22] portal hypertension,[23,24] hepatic decompensation[9,13,25] and extrahepatic benefits, such as reduced risks of non-HCC malignancy,[26] diabetes mellitus[27] and cardiovascular disease.[17,28]

A DAA-induced SVR reduces the risk of mortality. However, the risk factors associated with liver-related and non-liver-related mortality in patients with SVR following DAA treatment are unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors of liver-related and non-liver-related mortality in patients who achieved SVR after DAA treatment in a real-world cohort.

processing....