Medication-Attributable Adverse Events in Heart Failure Trials

Josephine Harrington, MD; Gregg C. Fonarow, MD; Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, MD, MSC; Adrian Hernandez, MD, MHS; Stefan Anker, MD, PHD; Michael Böhm, MD; Stephen J. Greene, MD; G. Michael Felker, MD, MHS; Muthiah Vaduganathan, MD, MPH; Javed Butler, MD, MPH, MBA

Disclosures

JACC Heart Fail. 2023;11(4):425-436. 

In This Article

Abstract and Introduction

Abstract

Background: Initiation and up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains suboptimal, in part because of concerns regarding tolerability and adverse events (AEs).

Objectives: The authors sought to compare rates of AE in patients randomized to GDMT medication vs placebo in a meta-analysis of landmark cardiovascular outcomes trials.

Methods: The authors assessed rates of reported AE in 17 landmark HFrEF clinical trials across each class of GDMT in the placebo and intervention arms. The overall rates of AE for each drug class, the absolute difference in frequency in AEs between the placebo and intervention arms, and the odds of each AE according based on randomization strata were calculated.

Results: AE were reported commonly in trials across each class of GDMT, with 75% to 85% of participants reporting at least 1 AE. There was no significant difference in the frequency of AE between the intervention and placebo arms, except for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (87.0% [95% CI: 85.0%-88.8%] vs 82.0% [95% CI: 79.8%-84.0%], absolute difference: +5% with intervention; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in drug discontinuation because of AE between placebo and intervention arms in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker trials. Patients randomized to beta-blocker were significantly less likely to stop study drug because of AE than placebo (11.3% [95% CI: 10.3%-12.3%] vs 13.7% [95% CI: 12.5%-14.9%], absolute difference: −1.1%; P = 0.015). When individual types of AE were assessed, the initiation of an intervention vs placebo resulted in small differences in absolute frequency of AE that were largely not statistically significant.

Conclusions: In clinical trials of GDMT for HFrEF, AEs are observed frequently. However, rates of AE are similar between active medication and control, suggesting these may reflect the high risk nature of the heart failure disease state rather than be attributive to a specific therapy.

Introduction

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are at risk for poor clinical and quality of life outcomes.[1–3] These risks are reduced with the use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), which consists of beta-blockers, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system agents, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, which each have a Class 1 recommendation for use in patients with HFrEF without contraindication.[4] Compared with therapy with a renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system agent and beta-blocker, comprehensive therapy with all 4 drugs is estimated to extend life of a 55-year-old patient by more than 6 years, and by more than 1 year even in octogenarians.[5]

However, patients with HFrEF are often not prescribed these drugs or generally receive doses below the target.[6,7] These gaps in use and dosing of GDMT have important implications. It is estimated that optimal use of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) would prevent 28,000 deaths in the United States annually, with an additional 34,000 deaths prevented with SGLT2 inhibitor use.[8,9] One possible reason that clinicians are hesitant to escalate these therapies is the perceived risk of adverse events (AEs) or side effects.[10–12] Providers may worry that GDMT will provoke hypotension, kidney injury, or metabolic disturbances in patients vulnerable to such events.[13] Likewise, patients who experience HF or other symptoms while on GDMT may have these symptoms attributed to GDMT, which may result in medication discontinuation and/or patients being labeled intolerant, without further attempts to use them.

Patients with HFrEF have a high burden of symptoms overall.[3] Although patients may truly be unable to tolerate GDMT, in some cases these symptoms may be a manifestation of HFrEF and other comorbidities and not related to a medication. In this case, the use of GDMT may not impact or may even improve symptoms over time, while decreasing the risk of hospitalization and death. To assess the frequency of AE in patients with HFrEF, and to understand the percentage attributable to the use of GDMT, we evaluated the relative rates of common AE in major cardiovascular trials of GDMT, comparing rates in both the placebo and intervention arms, and calculating a placebo-adjusted frequency of AE to understand the impact of GDMT on the frequency of AE.

processing....