Interim Clinical Treatment Considerations for Severe Manifestations of Mpox

United States, February 2023

Agam K. Rao, MD; Caroline A. Schrodt, MD; Faisal S. Minhaj, PharmD; Michelle A. Waltenburg, DVM; Shama Cash-Goldwasser, MD; Yon Yu, PharmD; Brett W. Petersen, MD; Christina Hutson, PhD; Inger K. Damon, MD, PhD

Disclosures

Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2023;72(9):232-243.

Knowledge Gaps and Next Steps

Knowledge gaps regarding optimal treatment of severe mpox are best addressed through data collected during randomized controlled trials and other carefully controlled research studies. Patients enrolled in well-designed studies might benefit from the close monitoring provided by these studies (e.g., effective adjustments of tecovirimat doses are made as part of the STOMP trial based on serially monitored pharmacokinetic parameters). Understanding the role of immune dysregulation in the clinical course of severely immunocompromised HIV patients started on ARVs was frequently recognized as a knowledge gap: CDC has partnered with NIH to study this (Virologic and Immunologic Characteristics of Severe Mpox Among Persons with Advanced HIV [VIRISMAP] study).^{†††††} Clinicians and health departments are encouraged to contact CDC when treating mpox in a patient recently started on ARVs. Controlled studies focused on understanding the impact of monotherapy or combination therapy on virus shedding, duration of illness, and clinical outcomes are needed, particularly for patients with severe immunocompromise. Public health laboratories, academic laboratories, and CDC continue to sequence the F13L gene (the tecovirimat target) to assess F13L viral mutations that might be associated with resistance. Phenotypic testing to evaluate resistance is also occurring at CDC.^§§§§§ Analysis of anti-OPXV antibody levels and viral neutralization antibody levels are ongoing at CDC and are needed to develop guidance about redosing of VIGIV. Laboratories should consider examining T-cell and humoral responses to mpox in immunocompromised patients because immune response is crucial to viral clearance, and this data might facilitate development of improved clinical guidance.^[35]

Until data from controlled studies are available, observational data from patients treated under IND might provide insights into clinical outcomes. Providers administering MCMs under IND programs should complete and submit optional data collection forms to facilitate improved understanding of the role of MCMs. CDC will update guidance, as appropriate, as new data emerge.

1 2 3 4 5 6

Next Section

Acknowledgments
James Chodosh, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of New Mexico School of Medicine; Esther Freeman, George Hruza, American Academy of Dermatology Ad Hoc Task Force on Mpox Content; Susan Gorman, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response/Strategic National Stockpile; Michael Merchlinsky, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Daniel Pastula, Department of Neurology and Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Gary Roselle, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; Irini Sereti, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health; Steven Yeh, Truhlsen Eye Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center/Nebraska Medicine; Jason Zucker, Division of Infectious Diseases, Columbia University School of Medicine; Robert Fisher, Michael Kennedy, Jennifer Reed, Rosemary Roberts, Dorothy Scott, Food and Drug Administration; William Bower, Kevin Chatham-Stephens, Jennifer R. Cope, Athena Kourtis, James Lee, Sara Luckhaupt, Janet McNicholl, Dana Meaney-Delman, Sapna Bamrah Morris, Elliot Raizes, P.S. Satheshkumar, James Sejvar, Michael Townsend, Kate Hendricks Walters, Patricia Yu, CDC; clinicians and health department personnel who consulted CDC for complicated cases of mpox and CDC clinical officers who performed (and continue to perform) consultations.

Abstract and Introduction
MCMs Being Used to Treat Mpox and Indications for use
Approach to Using MCMs to Treat Mpox
Considerations in the Management of Severe Mpox Cases
Other Clinical Considerations
Knowledge Gaps and Next Steps
References
Sidebar

^{†††††} https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/mpox/clinicians/treatment.html
^§§§§§ https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/pdf/Optional-Lesion-Sample-to-CDC-for-Resistance-Testing.pdf

Table. Summarized mechanisms of action, administration recommendations, adverse events, clinical considerations, and supporting data about medical countermeasures that can be used to treat mpox* — United States, February 2023
Consideration	Medical countermeasures
Consideration	Tecovirimat (Tpoxx or ST-246)	Brincidofovir (Tembexa or CMX001)	Cidofovir (Vistide)	VIGIV	Trifluridine (Viroptic)
Description	An OPXV-specific antiviral with limited activity against unrelated RNA or DNA viruses	Lipid-conjugated analog of cidofovir with different properties compared with cidofovir	Monophosphate nucleotide analog used to treat viral infections including cytomegalovirus	Solvent- or detergent-treated, filtered sterile solution of purified immune globulin from human plasma of persons with antibodies to vaccinia virus	Nucleoside analog used to treat ocular viral infections including herpes simplex virus keratitis
Mechanism of action against OPXVs	Inhibits association of VP37 (a protein encoded by and highly conserved across the OPXV genus) with a cellular protein, preventing formation of egress-competent envelope virions necessary for cell-to-cell dissemination of virus	Once inside cells, the lipid ester linkage is cleaved to form cidofovir, which is then converted to CDP, which selectively inhibits OPXV DNA polymerase.	Intracellularly converted to CDP which selectively inhibits OPXV DNA polymerase	Provides passive antibody which might have cross-reactivity across the OPXV genus	Thymidine analog that interferes with DNA synthesis in cultured mammalian cells with selective toxicity to viral replication of OPXVs
Dose	600 mg^†	200 mg^§	5 mg/kg	6,000–9,000 units/kg^¶	One drop into affected eyes
Route	Oral (capsules) or IV**	Oral (tablets or suspension)	IV	IV	Topical
Frequency	Twice daily (40 kg to <120 kg) Three times daily (>120 kg)	Once weekly	Once weekly	Single dose but can be repeated depending on duration of illness and severity of immunocompromise	Every 2 hrs when awake for the first 2 wks (maximum nine drops per eye per day) Then, four times daily for an additional 2 wks
Duration	2 wks unless indication to prolong^††	2 wks unless indication to prolong^††	2 wks unless indication to prolong^††	NA	>4 wks
Potential adverse events	Headache, nausea, diarrhea, itching, and abdominal pain; labeled contraindication for IV administration when creatinine clearance is <30 mL/min^§§	Abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and elevated liver enzymes	Nephrotoxicity, nausea, vomiting, and acidosis	Adverse events associated with infusion of immunoglobulins (e.g., headache, diaphoresis, erythema, anaphylaxis, thrombosis, acute kidney injury, and volume overload)	Adverse events associated with topical use (e.g., burning, stinging, or eyelid edema)
Warnings	Other warnings: Clearance of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin is dependent on glomerular filtration, and caution is advised in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment, and in pediatric patients <2 yrs.	BBW: Increased mortality seen in a 24-wk placebo-controlled trial for CMV prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients. Prolonging therapy beyond 2 wks should be considered with caution, and currently requires FDA authorization on an individual patient basis through an emergency IND request. Other warnings: Neutropenia Potential human carcinogen, teratogen, and causing hypospermia	BBW: Severe nephrotoxicity resulting in dialysis or contributing to death. IV prehydration and administration of probenecid must be used with each infusion. Neutropenia Potential human carcinogen, teratogen, and causing hypospermia Other warnings: Decreased intraocular pressure, metabolic acidosis	Other warnings: Hypersensitivity, renal dysfunction, interference with blood glucose testing, thrombotic events, aseptic meningitis syndrome, hemolysis, transfusion-related acute lung injury, and transmission of infectious agents from human plasma	Other warnings: Continuous administration beyond the recommended duration might cause corneal epithelial toxicity.
Drug interactions	Might reduce levels of NNRTI rilpivirine Might increase concentration of blood glucose-lowering agent repaglinide Decrease concentration of midazolam	Protease inhibitors, cobicistat, and fostemsavir might increase brincidofovir concentration.	Cidofovir has limited interactions; however, it necessitates coadministration with probenecid which has numerous interactions (e.g., zidovudine, beta-lactam antimicrobials, diuretics, NSAIDs, and ACEi) that need to be monitored.	Vaccination with live virus vaccines (e.g., varicella measles, mumps, and rubella) should be deferred for 3 mos after use.	NA
Data gleaned from selected animal studies ^¶¶	Cynomolgus macaques were lethally challenged IV with MPXV and treated on day 4, 5, and 6 postchallenge. Treatment with tecovirimat for 14 days resulted in statistically significant improvement in survival relative to placebo, except when given starting at day 6 postchallenge.	In a lethal rabbitpox and mousepox (ectromelia) model of infection, treatment with brincidofovir resulted in statistically significant improvement in survival relative to placebo, except when given starting at day 6 postchallenge in the mousepox study.	In a lethal dormouse model of MPXV, cidofovir-treated mice reduced mortality from 100% to 19%.	In a mouse-tail lesion model, VIGIV exerted a protective effect against vaccinia infection when compared with a negative control.	In a study of 56 rabbits with vaccinia keratitis, trifluridine significantly reduced clinical disease and viral culture positivity.
Data gleaned from use in humans before and during the 2022 outbreak	Of 255 patients treated during the current outbreak,*** the median interval to first subjective improvement was 3 days with limited adverse events reported.	Limited use as monotherapy; used (unsuccessfully) alternating with cidofovir for severe cowpox infection in a kidney transplant recipient	Limited use as a sole agent; used for ocular cowpox infection with unclear benefit and once (unsuccessfully) alternating with brincidofovir for severe cowpox infection in a transplant recipient	Evidence for smallpox prevention when given to high-risk contacts Mixed evidence for efficacy for treatment of progressive vaccinia	Used successfully off-label for ocular complications of vaccinia virus vaccination
Pregnancy, breastfeeding, and fertility considerations	Likely safe in pregnancy and breastfeeding without affecting fertility	Not recommended for pregnancy or breastfeeding Might cause irreversible infertility in males	Not recommended for pregnancy or breastfeeding Might cause irreversible infertility in males	Likely safe in pregnancy and breastfeeding without affecting fertility	Negligible systemic absorption when administered into the eye; likely safe in pregnancy and breastfeeding without affecting fertility
CNS considerations ^†††	Penetrates well	Penetrates to uncertain degree	Penetrates to limited degree	Penetrates to limited degree	NA
Resistance considerations	Single point mutation can confer resistance.^§§§	Single point mutation can confer minor resistance; however, multiple mutations are needed for high-level resistance and the resultant virus becomes less virulent.	Single point mutation can confer minor resistance; however, multiple mutations are needed for high-level resistance and the resultant virus becomes less virulent.	NA	Although in vitro resistance has not been reported, the possibility of resistance exists.
Miscellaneous considerations	High-fat (approximately 600 calories and 25g fat) meal required with each oral dose IV administration should be considered in those who are unable to take oral therapy, unable to consume high-fat meal, have impaired gastrointestinal absorption (e.g., gastric bypass, diarrhea, or evidence of other gastrointestinal disfunction that might negatively affect drug absorption), or fail to improve on approximately 7 days of oral therapy.	Must be taken on an empty stomach or with a low-fat meal (approximately 400 calories with 25% of calories from fat) Might have superior antiviral activity to that of cidofovir because of increased cellular uptake Should not be administered within 1 wk of cidofovir because both form the same active metabolite (CDP), which has a prolonged duration of action	Must be given with probenecid to minimize nephrotoxicity Probenecid might have substantial drug interactions and consultation with a pharmacist is advised. Should not be administered within 1 wk of brincidofovir because both form the same active metabolite (CDP), which has a prolonged duration of action	Vaccinia-specific antibody, which might cross-react with MPXV Might interfere with endogenous antibody production and IgG antibody testing When used to treat vaccinia keratitis in rabbits, VIGIV resulted in prolonged scarring and stromal edema.	Can cause permanent limbal stem cell deficiency with prolonged use

Abbreviations: ACEi = angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; BBW = black box warning; CDP = cidofovir diphosphate; CMV = cytomegalovirus; CNS = central nervous system, EA-IND = expanded access – investigational new drug; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; IgG = immunoglobulin G; IND = investigational new drug; IV = intravenous; MPXV = Monkeypox virus; NA = not applicable; NNRTI = non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; OPXV = orthopoxvirus; VIGIV = vaccinia immune globulin intravenous.
*This table is a comprehensive synthesis of the heterogeneous evidence and is intended to foster strategic decision-making rather than serve as a prescriptive treatment guideline.^†Dosing for persons <40 kg and children is available at https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/pdf/tecovirimat-ind-protocol-cdc-irb.pdf.
^§Dosing for persons <48 kg and children is available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/214460s000,214461s000lbl.pdf.
^¶Data suggest that an aggressive early dosing regimen for patients with severe immunocompromise might be most beneficial; for this reason, a dose in the higher range (9,000 units/kg) early in the clinical course, potentially followed by an additional dose 3–4 days later, might help saturate viral antigens and halt viremia and viral replication.
**IV administration requires a syringe pump, a device that might not be easily accessible in all health care settings and has a slow infusion longer than 6 hours, irrespective of total infusion volume.
^††Per EA-IND, the standard duration of tecovirimat treatment is 14 days, with clinical data being limited to a 14-day course. Based on individual patient risk-benefit assessment and disease progression, tecovirimat and cidofovir may be extended beyond 14 days, or shortened because of lack of virologic or clinical response or adverse event occurrence. Extension of brincidofovir currently requires FDA authorization on an individual patient basis through an emergency IND request secondary to concerns related to the BBW stated within the table.
^§§Secondary to potential accumulating of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, an excipient in the IV tecovirimat formulation, which is eliminated through glomerular filtration. IV tecovirimat may be used with caution in patients with renal impairment (creatine clearance <30 mL/min) only if drug absorption via enteral administration is not anticipated to be dependable or feasible, and based on the risk-benefit assessment by the treating clinician that determines IV tecovirimat clinically necessary.
^¶¶Other animal studies examine the use of these agents; the studies noted within the table were used to gain FDA approval or provide evidence of efficacy for its off-label use.
***https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7137e1.htm?s_cid=mm7137e1_w
^†††CNS penetration was determined based on available animal and human data. Well: data suggested that an MCM was able to cross the blood-brain barrier and enter intrathecal space at concentrations known to be effective; Uncertain: data suggested that an MCM can cross the blood-brain barrier, but unclear if at sufficient concentrations to be effective; Limited: evidence suggested that an MCM does not or would not cross the blood-brain barrier. The theoretical utility of any medical countermeasure in clearing MPXV from the central nervous system is unknown.
^§§§To date, <0.5% specimens (out of >5,000 specimens) sent to CDC for testing have been found to develop resistance within the current outbreak.

Box. Important clinical considerations for management of severe mpox* — United States, February 2023
Ocular infections • Clinical manifestations: Symptoms include eye pain, redness, drainage, foreign body sensation, vision changes or loss, or periorbital swelling. Involvement of the ocular surface can manifest as blepharitis, conjunctivitis, or keratitis; discrete lesions might be present. Lesions can also occur on external areas including the eyelids. • Diagnostic findings: In a patient with known or suspected mpox, ocular infection can be confirmed by testing swabs from periorbital, lid or intraocular lesions for OPXV by PCR. • Treatment: Prompt initiation of tecovirimat and topical administration of trifluridine should be considered. Trifluridine can also be used prophylactically in patients with mpox who are at high risk of ocular infection (e.g., lesions near the eye). Other systemic MCMs should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Lubricants and topical antibiotics may be considered for symptomatic management and prevention of complications. • Other considerations: Obtain ophthalmology consultation.^† Adverse events might occur from prolonged use of trifluridine. In addition, one animal study suggests increased risk of corneal scarring when VIGIV is administered in the setting of OPXV keratitis. Extensive use of agents that can further irritate the eye, such as topical povidone-iodine, might be avoided. Appropriate measures to prevent, diagnose, and treat ocular coinfections and superinfections should be taken. Neurologic complications • Clinical manifestations: Encephalitis and myelitis can occur. Severe headache, back or neck pain, altered mental status, seizures, or focal neurologic deficits in a patient with mpox or recently recovered from mpox should prompt suspicion for neurologic complications. • Diagnostic findings: CSF might demonstrate a lymphocytic-predominant pleocytosis with protein elevation and normal glucose; availability of mpox-specific CSF testing is limited and consultation with CDC is suggested. MRI might show lesions in the brain or spinal cord which might or might not enhance. • Treatment: Treatment of mpox-associated neurologic disease should involve MCMs and might involve immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, or plasmapheresis or plasma exchange). Clinicians treating mpox-associated neurologic disease should weigh the risks and benefits of immunosuppressive agents when direct viral neuroinvasion is a possibility. Data suggest tecovirimat penetrates the CNS well; although brincidofovir, cidofovir, and VIGIV might penetrate the CNS, the extent is either uncertain (brincidofovir) or limited (cidofovir and VIGIV). • Other considerations: Consider neurology consultation. Neurologic disease related to mpox might be because of direct viral invasion of the CNS or resultant autoimmune disease from antigenic stimulus. Other neurologic diseases with similar presentations should be investigated (e.g., infectious diseases such as viral encephalitides and syphilis, and autoimmune, parainfectious, and vascular conditions). Myopericarditis • Clinical manifestations: New complaints of chest pain, shortness of breath, or palpitations in a patient with ongoing or recent mpox should prompt consideration of myopericarditis. • Diagnostic findings: Similar findings to those associated with myopericarditis from etiologies other than mpox might be observed, including elevations in cardiac biomarkers, changes in electrocardiogram and on cardiovascular MRI, and pathologic changes of the myocardium. • Treatment: Standard of care for myopericarditis should be considered; MCMs might also play a role by limiting viral spread to myocytes or decreasing the production of viral antigens responsible for the inflammatory response. • Other considerations: Consider cardiology consultation. Other causes of myopericarditis should be investigated, including other viral infections or recent receipt of a vaccination that can be associated with myopericarditis. Complications associated with some mucosal (oral, rectal, genital, and urethral) lesions • Clinical manifestations: Symptoms can include impaired activities of daily living (e.g., feeding, urination, or defecation) from painful or obstructing rectal, urinary tract, oral, and genital lesions, especially if associated with strictures, substantial edema, severe lymphadenopathy, or necrosis. Lesions might expose deep tissue including muscle or bone, and myonecrosis can occur. Healing might be slow, and scarring can result in strictures. • Diagnostic findings: Complications associated with mucosal lesions can be diagnosed by physical examination in conjunction with other diagnostic testing; the diagnosis of mpox can be made by sampling mucosal or other lesions. • Treatment: Prompt initiation of systemic MCMs should be considered. Some patients have required intubation, urinary catheterization, or placement of enteric tubes. Early and aggressive treatment might prevent such complications. Routine use of topical antimicrobial agents, particularly over-the-counter options, is not indicated and might cause irritation, contact dermatitis, or delayed wound healing.^§ Debridement is generally not recommended. • Other considerations: Specialists (e.g., surgery, urology, or gastroenterology) should be consulted early in the clinical course. Symptomatic management, and especially pain control, is an important component of treatment. Coinfections and superinfections should be diagnosed and treated promptly. Sequelae are not fully known but can result in substantial morbidity (e.g., scarring leading to functional impairment, or necrosis necessitating surgical debridement, penectomy, or amputation of extremities). Complications from uncontrolled viral spread in moderately to severely immunocompromised patients • Clinical manifestations: Numerous, large, coalescing, or necrotic lesions of the skin can occur in patients with severe immunocompromise. Other organ systems (e.g., gastrointestinal tract, liver, lungs, brain, or adrenal glands) can be involved, resulting in signs and symptoms of organ dysfunction irrespective of severity of cutaneous lesions. Overwhelming systemic illness including sepsis can occur and might progress to death. • Diagnostic findings: Uncontrolled viral spread can manifest as the appearance of new skin lesions or worsening of existing lesions. Involvement of other organ systems can result in a range of findings on physical exam and laboratory investigations (e.g., gastrointestinal obstruction, severe pneumonia, empyema, encephalitis, intractable hypotension, or transaminitis). Alternate or coinciding causes of severe illness should be investigated. • Treatment: Immune function should be optimized through interventions such as effective HIV antiretrovirals and reduced immunomodulatory therapy as feasible. Prompt initiation of tecovirimat (potentially the intravenous formulation), and possible combination with either cidofovir or brincidofovir, and VIGIV, should be considered. Wound care is critical to ensure healing and prevent superinfection and autoinoculation.^§ Diffuse skin lesions might cause insensible fluid losses requiring intensive fluid management. • Other considerations: Consider consultation with experts in infectious diseases, critical care, dermatology, wound care, gastroenterology, and surgery (e.g., general surgery, plastic surgery, and burn experts) as indicated. Administration of MCMs for extended durations (>14 days) might be reasonable if clinically indicated (e.g., new or progressive mpox lesions occur). The role of immune dysregulation in severe mpox illness is not known; there is no high-quality evidence to support or refute the use of steroids and other immunomodulators, and clinicians should weigh the risks and benefits of such therapies because optimal immune function aids recovery from mpox. Supportive care and close clinical monitoring for occurrence of complications such as secondary bacterial infections and sepsis can be critical in patients with severe mpox illness.
Abbreviations: CNS = central nervous system; CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; MCM = medical countermeasure; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; OPXV = orthopoxvirus; PCR = polymerase chain reaction; VIGIV = vaccinia immune globulin intravenous. *This report is a comprehensive synthesis of the heterogeneous evidence and is intended to foster strategic decision-making rather than serve as a prescriptive treatment guideline. ^†Urgent ophthalmology consultation and management is particularly important for patients with eye pain, vision loss, or worsening ocular symptoms. ^§https://www.aad.org/public/diseases/a-z/monkeypox-self-care